Webroot vs Norton (2023 Comparison) – Forbes Advisor

When it comes to cybersecurity, one size rarely fits all. Each business has its unique operational dynamics, digital touchpoints and threat vulnerabilities. Webroot and Norton offer distinct approaches and features that cater to different business needs. A head-to-head comparison between them will help understand the nuances and strengths of each, allowing you to align their choice with their specific requirements.

Impact on System Performance

Webroot is known for its lightweight design and cloud-centric model, which minimizes its demand on system resources. The software runs unobtrusively in the background, allowing for smooth device operations. Quick installations and updates further enhance its appeal for businesses seeking minimal interruptions.

Norton is more resource-intensive due to its comprehensive toolset. Over the years, Norton has evolved to optimize its impact on device performance. For instance, its latest versions are designed for efficiency, with features such as “Silent Mode” to reduce disruptions during intensive tasks. Although it demands more system resources than Webroot, its extensive protection often justifies the trade-off for many users.

Password Management

Norton’s password manager is part of its Norton 360 suite. It is a robust tool that emphasizes encryption and secure storage. It not only stores passwords but also offers storage for credit card information and notes, all protected by bank-grade encryption. Norton’s Password Manager tool can generate strong passwords and auto-fill credentials. An added feature is its ability to alert users about weak or duplicate passwords, encouraging better password hygiene. With a user-friendly interface and integration into its broader security ecosystem, Norton provides a comprehensive password management solution.

Webroot, on the other hand, provides password management for its premium plans via LastPass Premium.

Firewall Protection

Webroot’s firewall feature is designed to complement the existing firewall in a user’s operating system, enhancing protection rather than replacing it. For instance, Webroot’s firewall monitors only the outbound traffic, not inbound, ensuring that malware within a system does not communicate with external servers.

In contrast, Norton offers a more comprehensive stand-alone firewall as part of its security suite. It monitors both inbound and outbound traffic, providing robust protection against unauthorized access and potential threats.

Norton’s firewall is known for its deep customization options, allowing users to set specific rules for different applications and network conditions. With its intrusion prevention system, it actively blocks suspicious activities, ensuring a fortified defense against potential cyber threats.