The Pirti coalition proposed to change the religious law and remove these conditions, but Prime Minister Petr Fiala, the leader of the ruling parties, refused to accept it as a sign of cultural upheaval.
However, the constitutional court annulled the sections that required castration and sterilization for a change of sex, effective from mid-2025.
These paragraphs of the Constitution were challenged by a man who was born a woman, but identifies as a man. Politicians must adopt a new law.
The case before them was heard by courts ranging from the municipal to the Supreme Court, the judgments referred, among other things, to the traditional form of families. The builder never succeeded. And now the court of law found him right.
Judge reporter Jaromr Jirsa pointed out that the condition of the operation and sterilization of the hunter is not in accordance with human rights and dignity. The judges consider the current situation untenable.
Until now, it was necessary to surgically impair the reproductive function, or after a child. And according to the need to change the genitals plastic surgery. The change of gender status according to the current rules, according to constitutional judges, interferes with the personal integrity of trans people.
Surgical procedures interfere with human dignity, they are required even by those who do not want to undergo them. It is contrary to human dignity for the state to ask them to change the appearance and functionality of their bodies just for the sake of gender status, Jirsa pointed out.
The new one will be officially confirmed by the nurse. The constitutional court thus pointed out that the forms of names and surnames will change according to the new first status. The waiter did not object to this.
Constitutional Court orders lawmakers to adopt new gender reassignment law. What the new law should look like, let’s say.
The plenum did not make a unanimous decision, two of the fifteen constitutional judges were against.
A few days ago, even the Prime Minister Pirti wanted to change the coalition, but they did not succeed. Now the court of law has proved them right.
The condition of sterilization of trans persons for one sex change is a completely barbaric and backward practice. I can’t interfere in people’s lives at all, it’s not necessary. And it’s absolutely unacceptable to slur who I am and who I am not to have the possibility of reproduction. Even the European Court of Human Rights decided that it was a violation of human rights. That’s why I opened the darkness again to one of the government parties with the fact that we have to finally abolish this practice and send it back to the center where it belongs, Pirt Ivan Barto told iDNES.cz.
TOP 09 girl Markta Pekarov Adamov joined him in the coalition, but that didn’t happen. Some of the coalition partners did not support this step, which is surprising when Minister Pavel Blaek publicly proposed it a year ago, and at the same time these parties are concerned with freedom and the West. Obviously, only when it suits them. We will refuse to act on that for the Pirtys and will continue to press for the fact that all people in the country have the same first place and the government has enough of its promises, Barto described the dispute in the coalition.
The demand for castration contradicts basic human rights, Blakv Namstek said last year
The demand for castration contradicts basic human principles, said Karel Dvok, Deputy Minister of Justice Pavel Blak, at the end of last year. Even our ministry has approached this problem in such a way that it would be appropriate to remove the condition of sterilization and to request only a diagnosis for a sex change, Blakv nmstek added a year ago
On Tuesday, the constitutional court decided whether this article of paragraph 29. Changing the sex of a hunter through a surgical procedure should remain in the Civil Code. The day of gender change is considered to be the day indicated in the confirmation issued by the health service provider.
The court rejected two similar petitions by a person who claimed that she was not his wife
The last time the constitutional court dealt with the issue, it rejected the proposal to annul the first right. However, the individual history of the hunter, who turned to the court now, is different.
In the past, the court accepted on the basis of the initiative so-called non-binary persons who did not consider themselves to be either a man or a woman. Now it’s a transgender woman, he really tried to change his gender, including a male name and a male form of his birth weight, but the operation is a pain for him.
the author wished that once the information about him was recorded, it would take into account how to honor himself, without having to undergo a surgical procedure. He stated that the legal provisions are in conflict with his human dignity, first of all equality, protection of health, respect for private life and family.
When the Supreme Court heard his case last year, it confused the truth and emphasized in the decision the principle of restraint in similar matters and thus the protection of the family’s basic natural attributes.
Tags: surgery required official gender reassignment Constitutional Court annulled sections
-
