You can not be serious! The judge harshly grilled the former chief prosecutor

You can not be serious! The judge harshly grilled the former chief prosecutor
You can not be serious! The judge harshly grilled the former chief prosecutor
--

Drink new, young, but it will be sec, new. Not like j. He doesn’t bother. I know a girl from one of Cimrman’s plays could be suitable for a runner at the Municipal Court in Prague.

After the judge Kamil Kydalka, who retired last fall at the age of ten, the high-profile case of JO Investment (JO) with those thousands of defrauded clients was brought to the table by the young chairman of the court, Luk Svrek. And in the main line, which started this week on Monday, the two repeatedly made it clear that they who do not start are also in the Czech judiciary.

Last December, Judge Svrek granted ten business days (from April to November) for the year of Piblin, during which he wants to discuss this extraordinary case. He then specified in the animal of the third year that there will be dozens of them in the last week of May.

The defense attorney Vlastimil Rampula, who by the way led the High State Attorney’s Office in Prague in 2007 and 2011, informed the judge at that time that he did not like it, because in May he was going to prosecute another of his clients in another trial.

Who is it for me? When did you drink the preliminaries to (this) main line, doctor? December 27, 2023. For me, after those months, who do you have any (other) main line? Don’t think so vn! the judge got angry.

Gradually attack the principal, the lawyer explained. Two of you thought of this, so you’ll do it somehow, replied the uncompromising Spruce. Rampula insisted that we could not secure compensation, because both of his clients in this case and in the other case refused to be substituted, i.e. to be replaced by one of his colleagues.

I have absolutely no interest in that. You can do it however you want, but you or a substitute will be here. Seen! the judge announced in a loud voice. When I’m not here, so what happens? asked the defense attorney. You will have a problem at the AK (or attorney’s office), the court judge answered him.

Vmna nzor then continued to drive. as I know that if you are not here, it is your fault, insisted the chairman of the senate. They must then wonder how the jurisprudence treats this situation. If you won’t be here, you are (rushed) to AK. How far can I go, Svrek threatened. I take it, Rampula concluded.

Interview 4000 people? Urit no, said the judge

The lawyer and the judge met near Nzoro on the second day, when the lawyer announced that he would like to hear all the damage to those thousands during the hearing.

All those who made covenants are witnesses in their own way. They can find out how they concluded them, under what circumstances, with whom they dealt, what they were promised and how they decided to invest their funds in the JO Investment company, Rampula claimed.

The court will certainly not hear those types of witnesses. Svrek did not agree with the jurisprudence, which is rich in this court, that there are some witnesses of a similar type and character.

The owner of the JO company, Jakub Ortinsk, and his chief business editor and former taxi driver, Petra Orfa, on Monday denied the charge of fraud and legalization of criminal activity.

On Tuesday, the court heard the other two accused, Ortinská’s cousin Martin Hromada, a taxi driver who had a client agenda in the company, and the owner’s mother, Jitka Ortinská, a police officer from Prague. They, too, deny that they have committed anything illegal.

Ortinsk admitted that the company did not have the corresponding license of the Czech National Bank (NB), but disagreed with the fact that it defrauded clients. Registration with NB allowed the JO company to offer investment services, but only to a small circle of relatives and friends, a maximum of 20 people.

Instead, according to state representative Boris Havel, the troika defrauded him of more than 3,700 people and 162 companies over the years. According to the report, Ortinskho’s mother gradually received at least 3.5 million crowns from her son’s company, even though she was not an investor in it. The packaging blames her for negligent money laundering.

I was a client of JO, the contract exists, mm it in paprov form. It is in the system and in electronic form. I applied for financial resources. The options that were available and that I selected were evaluated. All the pensions I collected are taxed, she said curtly and flatly refused to answer questions.

Billions are in the US, tough, mysterious executive

Ortinsk described in court on Monday that he got into the store at a young age. He founded the JO company in 2016 (he was 20 years old), when he didn’t expect it to do big business.

Together with the other defendants, Petr Orfa and Martin Hromada, they divided the business between their names. Even later, according to him, it was not about the company providing services to the general public. It was a recommendation of a product that I have, said Ortinsk. The birth of the license began with the initials eit and so on.

Sttn sstupce describes in the envelope that Ortinsk had to use the money he used to buy two Ferrari cars, according to one Mercedes, a Rolls-Royce and a Maserati.

He had to deal with the fact that he had an investment company and his own pension, so it was about the payment of his valued finances. He stated that neither Orfa nor Hromada dn sold the products. orfa only represented the company to clients, Hromada was a back office worker, so he was in charge of clients, he added. According to their own words, both men worked with JO extern, first invoicing as OSV, then with their newly founded company.

The JO company, which offered clients 10 percent of the money invested, had only one female employee, the receptionist, in addition to Ortinskha. According to their own words, both Orfa and Hromada invested in this way. For example, the first company JO owed him a hundred thousand crowns, for which he received back, as heard in court, tens of millions.

According to the packaging, in fact, on the day of the investment, the deals did not go through. It was supposed to be a typical fraud known as an airplane, a pyramid or a Ponzi scheme, where the deposits of new clients are used to pay off existing clients.

Ortinsk disagrees with that. He declared in court that the company was paralyzed by the police intervention. According to him, the fact that they were forbidden to use the pension led to insolvency. He added that he is sure that the sums will be collected in the insolvency, he will be able to pay all the deposits and the code day will not arise. He drew attention to the fact that some deposits had been paid out.

According to judge Luke Svrka, more than a billion crowns were seized from them, while the defendant stated that they had stolen about 2.4 billion crowns in code. Ortinsk claims that roughly 3.6 billion dollars were deposited in an unspecified American account, but he still hasn’t found it in any way. It is a defense strategy.

The police did not investigate such an account. esk branch of the bank, unm company JO et, about the current account in Bank of America nev and Ortinsk refused to talk about the details. His cousin Hromada stated in court on Tuesday that he had seen an entry in pdf format from this property and that the changeable amount on it was actually payable in Australian dollars.

Prosecutor Havel proposed eight years in prison and a fine of 25 million crowns for Ortinskho. Ten years and ten million fines for Orfa and Hromad. For all of them, it means ten years of destruction of activity. Ortinsk suggested a one-year condition and a fine of two million.

The article is in Czech

Tags: judge harshly grilled chief prosecutor

-

PREV Here’s What $2 Million Mike Tyson Vs. Jake Paul VIP Package Includes
NEXT How to watch the Colorado Avalanche vs. Winnipeg Jets NHL Playoffs game tonight: Game 5 livestream options, more