Libor Bouček, a professional in his field
I have to say that I consider Mr. Bouček to be a great presenter, producer, screenwriter and that he creates a pleasant environment in this show. Plus, he’s funny and smart.
Mr. Libor, this is getting out of hand
It is short on Jakub Prachar. He usurps the right of dominance, his inputs into the show’s concept are unsolicited and very often annoying. He comments on everything, believing that he is extremely funny, but not everyone is impressed by his humor. In contrast to him, Vojta Kotek is a much more interesting guide for his team, always socially adjusted, tactful and usually yielding to his rival. Although recently it is starting to defend itself moderately with inequality in the competition.
The competition is rife with unfairness
To my right, to my left… Introduction, which should probably be a justification that J. Prachař will always be preferred. Why isn’t it on the switch?
Suddenly, Mr. Prachař gets into a frenzy and rants nonsense in an attempt to draw as much attention to himself as possible. Everyone laughs a little out of duty, or to encourage a good mood, and Mr. Duster steams like a rooster in a garbage dump.
Press the button – it is best to shatter it
Embarrassing and a bad role model for the kids watching. Common property must not be destroyed. Otherwise, it would be an interesting competition for perception and memory, but who wins here is always debatable. J. Prachar’s tactics work and he always wins first place.
Wandering the box around
So I’m happy to wait for that, here the competition tells a lot about a person’s knowledge. Not only me, but also the viewer is often amazed. Sometimes it embarrasses me when public figures, whom I have no doubt, do not know when the 1st or 2nd World War started and ended, they do not know the answers to the generally known history and culture of the nation. I understand that you don’t have to remember when you’re fast, but you don’t play for speed here. They often delay unnecessarily by remaining silent and do not pursue the question further. I have to pay an imaginary tribute to V. Kotko and J. Prachař, as they brilliantly answer the questions.
Did it explode in your hands? You puke!
Although it is a knowledge team game, none of the actors are ultimately interested in knowledge – ignorance, but only the explosion of the box. BANG! And all of a sudden everything is reset to zero, what anyone knew – they were useless. Points, and they are not few, are automatically awarded to the team that avoided the explosion. Couldn’t this part of the competition be made fairer and more interesting, so that the positive answers of both teams are added up? And the winner would be clear and fully deserved. If a tie occurs, the points will be split. If the box explodes, a point would be deducted from the team in question.
No pain! There is pantomime – no talking
In this discipline, both teams and spectators will have a lot of fun. J. Prachař begins, of course, the moderator reads the questions that he has prepared in advance for each team. When it comes to V. Kotka’s team, the questions are already asked. Not by chance, the more demanding ones remained for him.
For example, how Mr. Libor Bouček would pretend that it was toilet paper when he mentioned this topic to him and subsequently asked V. Kotka why he was reaching for his ass.
Questions should be drawn from a hat
It’s the same with discipline in drawing. Again, questions assigned by Mr. Bouček. Painting skills are sometimes admirable, but what is valid, some subject is more challenging. If each actor could draw them himself, no one would think of solving anything.
Both of their teams’ guides are knowledgeable, so it doesn’t sit well with viewers when one of them is favored. Although it is a game where luck or bad luck also has its place.
