The gaming performance of Ryzen 7 8700G is 30% above GeForce GTX 1650

The gaming performance of Ryzen 7 8700G is 30% above GeForce GTX 1650
The gaming performance of Ryzen 7 8700G is 30% above GeForce GTX 1650
--

Last year’s comparison, which was presented by AMD, of course, concerned the mobile variants of both products, but as the editors of the Chinese website MyDrivers have now found out, it also applies to the desktop. There was a comparison of a Core i9-14900K combined with a GeForce GTX 1650. The original model with GDDR5 was chosen (the later version with GDDR6 brought practically no performance shift) and the performance was compared in 12 games:

If the titles of the games are difficult to read, know that they are (in this order, omitting 3DMarks): GTA V, Assassin’s Creed: Valhalla, Horizon: Zero Dawn, Far Cry 5, Far Cry 6, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Forza Horizon 5, PUBG, Cyberpunk 2077, The Witcher 3, Borderlands 3 and Gears 5.

The integrated Ryzen 7 8700G with DDR5-8000 graphics is 30% faster in gaming (not counting 3DMarks) than the combination of Core i9-14900K + GeForce GTX 1650. The Ryzen 7 8700G with DDR5-6400 is also 15% faster with 3DMarks, and the mainstream Ryzen 5 8600G it offers the same performance as the aforementioned combination of Core and GeForce. However, the Ryzen 5 8600G still offers a more balanced performance, which did not go below 30 FPS in any of the tested games, while on the GeForce GTX 1650 it went below 30 FPS in three titles.

Ryzen cores
train.
clock / boost L3 TDP GPU price
R9 7950X3D 16/32 4.2 / 5.7 GHz 128MB 120W 2 CU RDNA2 $699
7950X 16/32 4.5 / 5.7 GHz 64MB 170W 2 CU RDNA2 $699
5950X 16/32 3.4 / 4.9 GHz 64MB 105W $799
7900X3D 12/24 4.4 / 5.6 GHz 128MB 120W 2 CU RDNA2 $599
7900X 12/24 4.7 / 5.6 GHz 64MB 170W 2 CU RDNA2 $549
5900X 12/24 3.7 / 4.8 GHz 64MB 105W $549
7900 12/24 3.7 / 5.4 GHz 64MB 65W 2 CU RDNA2 $429
5900 12/24 3.0 / 4.7 GHz 64MB 65W OEM
R7 7800X3D 8 / 16 4.2 / 5.0 GHz 96MB 120W 2 CU RDNA2 $449
5800X3D 8 / 16 3.4 / 4.5 GHz 96MB 105W $449
5800X 8 / 16 3.8 / 4.7 GHz 32MB 105W $449
5800 8 / 16 3.4 / 4.6 GHz 32MB 65W OEM
7700X 8 / 16 4.5 / 5.4 GHz 32MB 105W 2 CU RDNA2 $399
5700X3D 8 / 16 3.0 / 4.1 GHz 96 MB 105W $249
5700X 8 / 16 3.4 / 4.6 GHz 32MB 65W $299
7700 8 / 16 3.8 / 5.3 GHz 32MB 65W 2 CU RDNA2 $329
8700G 8 / 16 4.2 / 5.1 GHz 16MB 65W 12 CU RDNA3 $329
8700F 8 / 16 4.2 / 5.1 GHz? 16MB 65W ?
8700GE 8 / 16 3.65 / 5.1 GHz 16MB 35W 12 CU RDNA3 OEM
5700 8 / 16 3.7 / 4.6 GHz 16MB 65W $175
5700G 8 / 16 3.8 / 4.6 GHz 16MB
65W 8 CU Vega $359
5700GE 8 / 16 3.2 / 4.6 GHz 16MB 35W 8 CU Vega OEM
R5
7600X 6 / 12 4.7 / 5.3 GHz 32MB 105W 2 CU RDNA2 $299
5600X3D 6 / 12 3.3 / 4.4 GHz 96MB 105W $229
5600X 6 / 12 3.7 / 4.6 GHz 32MB 65W $299
7600 6 / 12 3.8 / 5.1 GHz 32MB 65W 2 CU RDNA2 $229
8600G 6 / 12 4.3 / 5.0 GHz 16MB 65W 8 CU RDNA3 $229
8600GE 6 / 12 3.9 /? GHz 16MB 35W 8 CU RDNA3 OEM
5600GT 6 / 12 3.6 / 4.6 GHz 16MB 65W 7 CU Vega $140
5600G 6 / 12 3.9 / 4.4 GHz 16MB
65W 7 CU Vega $259
5600 6 / 12 3.5 / 4.4 GHz 32MB 65W $199
5600GE 6 / 12 3.4 / 4.4 GHz 16MB 35W 7 CU Vega OEM
7500F 6 / 12 3.7 / 5.0 GHz 32MB 65W $179
8500G 2+4 / 12 3.5 / 5.0 GHz 16MB 65W 4 CU RDNA3 $179
8500GE 2+4 / 12 3.4 /? GHz 16MB 35W 4 CU RDNA3 OEM
5500GT 6 / 12 3.6 / 4.4 GHz 16MB 65W 7 CU Vega $125
5500 6 / 12 3.6 / 4.2 GHz 16MB 65W $159
8400F 2+4/12? 3.x / 4.x GHz ? 65W ?
R3 8300G 1+3 / 8 3.4 / 4.9 GHz 8MB 65W 4 CU RDNA3 OEM
8300GE 1+3 / 8 3.5 /? GHz 8MB 35W 4 CU RDNA3 OEM
5300G 4 / 8 4.0 / 4.2 GHz 8MB 65W 6 CU Vega OEM
5300GE 4 / 8 3.6 / 4.2 GHz 8MB 35W 6 CU Vega OEM

The Ryzen 7 8700G (with both faster and slower memories) outperformed even the standalone Radeon RX 6400. It is therefore no wonder that AMD is preparing a GPU in this year’s generation of graphics cards Navi 44which former Navi 24 used on Radeon RX 6400/6500 within the new series will formally replace.

GeForce GTX 1650, although its production has officially ended, is still sold and is basically the most powerful product in Nvidia’s offer in the price range for 4,000 CZK (you can also find models with a price of over 5,000 CZK, but probably no sane person would buy them of their own free will , for a similar price, the much faster Radeon RX 6600 is available).

The GeForce GTX 1650 has a TDP of 75 watts, but most available models have a factory OC and a TDP of ~90 watts (power is increased more than power due to OC, as is usually the case). The TDP of the Core i9-14900K is 125 watts (real consumption can exceed 300 watts), but even if we take into account that a potential buyer of the GeForce GTX 1650 will buy a more affordable 65W Intel model, the maximum consumption of such a combo will still be many times higher than Ryzen 7 8700G / Ryzen 5 8600G.


The article is in Czech

Tags: gaming performance Ryzen #8700G GeForce GTX

-

PREV Google is shutting down the podcast app. You have to go elsewhere for the spoken word now
NEXT Software Harvest (April 3, 2024): watch for the right time