Would it be worth building a subway for you in Brno?
Used to limit the sweat of the population, when the state of the metro, is one million. It’s not worth it until this time. When you ask about Brno, we designed a piece of underground track for a tram there and it has been in operation for less than a year. But the mentioned poet is not important for anyone. If someone votes for me to build a subway from the general budget even where there are not a million inhabitants, then build it.
What are Prague’s geological conditions like? Good, Pat? Or a straight line?
Build two teams of each geological condition. But it’s a different kind of cargo. Fracture conditions are typically characterized by the fact that they are highly variable, with various tilted geological layers and asthmatic geological faults. esk construction companies have experience with digging the teba tunnel in Scandinavia, where, in contrast to Prague, they move in hard glass and consume a large amount of explosives.
From what form of public transport can it be said that it is a subway?
In ad metropolises, the metro runs in the center under the surface and on the peripheries on the surface. And below is the subway. In London, in Berlin or in Pai. You don’t have a subway anywhere, but an S-bahn. Somewhere they have it as a question of the S-bahn system and the subway as an addition to the capacity of the tram, I’m talking about Copenhagen. The system is vc
Prague must determine its metric specifics. How?
The Prask metro is unique in terms of transport capacity. M ti, not too long ago tyi, did not completely depend on the route. They are connected by manipulated rails, but in operation they are independent of each other. Trains do not move from route to route, they do not move anywhere. Each route has its own route d. This is the lowest, which allows the highest transport capacity. In other places, the routes branch off, in London there are underground tracks that look like tunnels, where one train has to wait for the other. When I’m talking about London, the subway there is about 300 kilometers long, and its transportation capacity is about three times that of Prague. The current stretch of the line is 65 kilometers and carries an average of over a million passengers per day. So compare it, who is vkonnj. It’s like a crack in an underground train.
It used to be just about the subsurface of the tram. The people then insisted that we had to build a subway according to the Soviet model.
It’s a paradox. The underground tram was completed in the 60s of the last century, but then Soviet advisors slammed the table: You will build a subway like in Moscow and Leningrad. With the distance of an hour, it is possible to state where we would be if we only had the tram under the surface. Its capacity would not be enough for dvno. The advice of the Soviet comrades, it may sound stupid, but I clapped for it. Although it was forced, the story was decided. So she built a hundred-meter-long ascent, which can now accommodate a set of five cars. At times, only two-person trains ran on the track, then a fourth train and finally a fifth train were added.
Don’t leave people alone, not only on the subway, but also on the rest of public transport.
It is true that route C is close to its transport limits. In the pic, the shortest interval there is 110 seconds, in practice it is about 120. Now route D will be built and there will be a slightly different system, except for automatic trains without a driver. New technology should allow intervals of 90 and 100 seconds. And so that one train would leave the station and the other would go right behind it. The current security system is built on track circuits, areas where only one train goes. And the first train to leave the circuit, the one behind it will only be free. A tender has been announced for automatic trains on deck and, at the same time, a train on deck. You changed the criticism. But we have to realize that of all trips made by vehicles in Prague, 59 percent are for public transport, 41 percent for individual transport. This is a unique ratio among European capitals in favor of public transport.
Would it make sense to cover the metro?
Sometime in 2006, a detailed study was prepared for the last time, which modeled the public transport of Prague and the Central Bohemian region, and pondered over the long-term vision. Then it turned out that trams would cost the transport demand around the city. But it’s been twenty years, I think it would be worth talking about the model. Due to the traffic situation in Prague, it is typical that a huge number of people from the entire Stedoes region come here for work every day. Take u just a new route D that’s a relief. That is why the buses that bring people from the area south of the city every morning do not go further into Prague 4, but drop them off at the edge of the city.
Buckets on stairs are a favorite theme. Is leaky gut a big pain?
The meter is fifty years old and we will remember, the lifetime of all structures, technological equipment and waterproofing is not infinite. As it turns out, the lifetime of own building structures is very good. Now, due to very limited traffic, the ceiling is being repaired at the C station in Florence. There, it crashed into a structure made of prestressed concrete. The other 10 remaining stations are under construction, and no repairs can be undertaken. As for technological equipment and insulation, they must be repaired in shorter periods. The transport company set a strategy to repair two stations per year, and all of them in ten years. When you asked about buckets, the worst problem of this kind was in Jinonice. It has been repaired, but when it rained there, a stream flowed between the tracks. Unfortunately, the general salary is also the fact that once the materials from which the tunnels and stations are built have exhausted their life and fall apart, our descendants will have to build a new subway. the life of the Egyptian pyramids will certainly not be reached by the metro.
One of the highlights of the Prague metro. What would you include in this ppad?
In fifty years, the traffic has not changed even for a day. When won’t there be a failure on the hundred routes where it was washed away by the flood in 2002.
